2019-2020 ACS Supreme Court Review

The fourth edition of the American Constitution Society Supreme Court Review features a series of critical essays, penned by the nation’s top legal scholars, on the most important cases and themes from the U.S. Supreme Court’s October 2019 Term.

Contents:

Editor's Note

Steven D. Schwinn

Foreword

Cheryl I. Harris

Beyond June Medical and Roe v. Wade

Michele Goodwin

‘Sex’ and Religion after Bostock

Sachin S. Pandya
and Marcia McCormick

Holding Congress to its Word: Statutory Realism, Second Generation Textualism, and ACA Entrenchment in Maine Community Health Options

Abbe R. Gluck

Seila Law LLC v. CFPB the Persistent Myths of Presidentialism

Peter M. Shane

Re-Upping Appeasement: Religious Freedom and Judicial Politics in the 2019 Term

Nelson Tebbe and Micah Schwartzman

The Originalist Road Not Taken in Kansas v. Glover

Sarah A. Seo

Stranger Still: Thuraissigiamand the Shrinking Constitution

Jennifer M. Chacón

Hernandez v. Mesa: Questions Answered and Questions Avoided

Andrew Kent

Mazars and Vance, and President Trump’s Ongoing Assault on our Structural Constitution

Steven D. Schwinn

A Major Step Backwards for Civil Rights: Comcast v. National Association of African American-Owned Media

Erwin Chemerinsky

Department of Homeland
Security v. Regents of the University of California: A Dream Deferred

Cecillia D. Wang