March 21, 2013

Voices from the Field: Solutions from Current and Former Indigent Defense Providers


Gideon, Indigent Defense

Kanya Bennett

Director of Policy Development and Programming
Begin: 0:01

Cait Clarke

Director, Strategic Initiatives, National Legal Aid & Defender Association
Begin: 2:12

Abbe Smith

Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
Begin: 5:41

Michael Nachmanoff

Federal Public Defender, Eastern District of Virginia
Begin: 9:46

Lauren Sudeall Lucas

Assistant Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of Law
Begin: 14:06

Erica J. Hashimoto

Associate Professor of Law, University of Georgia School of Law
Begin: 16:37

Julia Leighton

General Counsel, Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia
Begin: 19:14

Discussion and Questions

74:56

On Thursday, March 21, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy hosted “Considering Gideon at 50: The History and Future of Indigent Defense.”  In the 1963 Gideon v. Wainwrightdecision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “any person haled into court, who is too poor to hire a lawyer, cannot be assured a fair trial unless counsel is provided for him.”  It was this unanimous decision, in an opinion authored by Justice Hugo Black, that gave true meaning to the Sixth Amendment right to counsel.  However, 50 years after this landmark decision, this country has fallen short of what is required of it by the Constitution.  Three-quarters of the public defender’s offices in the country have caseloads which exceed recommended caseload standards.  Some defenders are handling 500 felony cases per year when the American Bar Association advises they handle no more than 150.  In some jurisdictions, prosecuting attorney offices’ budgets are three times those of public defender offices’.  And in the midst of state budget crises, some offices have been forced to fire defenders. 

How far have we strayed from the Supreme Court’s intent in Gideon?  Have the Supreme Court’s right to counsel cases over the past 50 years been in the spirit of Gideon?  What was the historical, constitutional, and legal context in which the Supreme Court reached its unanimous decision in Gideon?  How do we respond to the contemporary indigent defense crisis?  Panelists discussed these and other questions throughout the symposium.

Voices from the Field: Solutions from Current and Former Indigent Defense Providers (1:00 p.m. – 2:30 p.m.):

  • ModeratorCait Clarke, Director, Strategic Initiatives, National Legal Aid & Defender Association
  • Erica J. Hashimoto, Associate Professor of Law, University of Georgia School of Law
  • Julia Leighton, General Counsel, Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia
  • Michael Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Eastern District of Virginia
  • Abbe Smith, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center
  • Lauren Sudeall Lucas, Assistant Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of Law